SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
Niche professsions doing the same thing journalists do
Oct 31st, 2005 by Tom Johnson

The
premise of the IAJ is to discover find how other professions and academic
disciplines do what we do as journalists.  That is, how do they
find and analyze data and then present the results of that
analysis. 

We recently subscribed (it's free) to Law Technology News.  It's no surprise that the data management needs of large law offices are
much the same as those of journalism organizations.  Lawyers
pretty much follow the RRAW-P process, too.  So topics like 
Calendaring, Case Management, Contact Management, Document Management,  Electronic Data Discovery (EDD)
are right up our alley.


Law Technology News doesn't do much journalism, in fact it pretty much
reprints press releases.  But it does provide many, many pointers
to products and methods related to journalism.  Give it a look.
as well.



When it comes time to do that redistricting story….
Oct 27th, 2005 by Tom Johnson

A future question for the SAT or GRE exams: “What is the relationship between Tom DeLay and redistricting?” 
Obviously that one is going to have many, many possible correct
answers.  But redistricting is a difficult and complex
topic.  This recent paper, though, might provide a good jumping
off point for reporters working on the topic.




“Public Choice Principles of Redistricting”



    BY:  JOHN G. MATSUSAKA

            USC Marshall School of Business

            USC School of Law

         THOMAS W. GILLIGAN

            University of Southern California

            Marshall School of Business



Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:

         http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=775186



Paper ID:  USC Law and Economics Research Paper No. 05-18; USC

         CLEO Research Paper No. C05-8

  Date:  July 2005



 Contact:  JOHN G. MATSUSAKA

 Email:  Mailto:matsusak@usc.edu

 Postal:  USC Marshall School of Business

         Dept. of Finance & Business Economics

         Los Angeles, CA 90089  UNITED STATES

 Phone:  213-740-6495

   Fax:  213-740-6650

 Co-Auth:  THOMAS W. GILLIGAN

 Email:  Mailto:TGILLIGAN@MARSHALL.USC.EDU

 Postal:  University of Southern California

         Marshall School of Business

         Los Angeles, CA 90089  UNITED STATES



ABSTRACT:

 This paper uses fundamental principles of public choice, mainly  the median voter theorem, to develop a simple theory of  redistricting. The focus is on how closely policy outcomes  correspond to majority rule. The main results are: (1) Potential  policy bias in favor of nonmajority groups is structurally  linked to the number of legislative seats and the population,  and the structure of most states puts them very close to the  theoretically maximum bias. (2) Random districting, which might  seem like the essence of neutrality, does not eliminate policy  bias on average. (3) Traditional principles of compact,  contiguous districts that respect existing political boundaries,  stressed in the Supreme Court's Shaw v. Reno decision, minimize

 the chance of nonmajoritarian outcomes.”





When it comes time to do that redistricting story….
Oct 27th, 2005 by Tom Johnson

A future question for the SAT or GRE exams: “What is the relationship between Tom DeLay and redistricting?” 
Obviously that one is going to have many, many possible correct
answers.  But redistricting is a difficult and complex
topic.  This recent paper, though, might provide a good jumping
off point for reporters working on the topic.




“Public Choice Principles of Redistricting”



    BY:  JOHN G. MATSUSAKA

            USC Marshall School of Business

            USC School of Law

         THOMAS W. GILLIGAN

            University of Southern California

            Marshall School of Business



Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:

         http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=775186



Paper ID:  USC Law and Economics Research Paper No. 05-18; USC

         CLEO Research Paper No. C05-8

  Date:  July 2005



 Contact:  JOHN G. MATSUSAKA

 Email:  Mailto:matsusak@usc.edu

 Postal:  USC Marshall School of Business

         Dept. of Finance & Business Economics

         Los Angeles, CA 90089  UNITED STATES

 Phone:  213-740-6495

   Fax:  213-740-6650

 Co-Auth:  THOMAS W. GILLIGAN

 Email:  Mailto:TGILLIGAN@MARSHALL.USC.EDU

 Postal:  University of Southern California

         Marshall School of Business

         Los Angeles, CA 90089  UNITED STATES



ABSTRACT:

 This paper uses fundamental principles of public choice, mainly  the median voter theorem, to develop a simple theory of  redistricting. The focus is on how closely policy outcomes  correspond to majority rule. The main results are: (1) Potential  policy bias in favor of nonmajority groups is structurally  linked to the number of legislative seats and the population,  and the structure of most states puts them very close to the  theoretically maximum bias. (2) Random districting, which might  seem like the essence of neutrality, does not eliminate policy  bias on average. (3) Traditional principles of compact,  contiguous districts that respect existing political boundaries,  stressed in the Supreme Court's Shaw v. Reno decision, minimize

 the chance of nonmajoritarian outcomes.”





In the tradition of William Playfair and Charles Joseph Minard….
Oct 26th, 2005 by Tom Johnson

Matt
Ericson of the NYTimes has delivered yet again a piece of superb
infographics.  This one, sadly, illustrates the 2000+ U.S. deaths
in Iraq.  (See “Deaths in Iraq by Month” in the 26 Oct. 2005 story “
2,000 Dead: As Iraq Tours Stretch On, a Grim Mark“)

William Playfair
(1759-1823) was the
Scottish engineer and political economist who did the ground-breaking work in visual statistics.  Charles Joseph Minard, in the mid-nineteenth century, produced the classic infographic of
Napoleon's March to (and retreat from) Moscow.  Minard's great
work is notable for displaying multiple data sets on a timeline as
well as their geographical relationships.

Ericson has done something similar by showing the combat deaths in Iraq
from the March 2003 invasion until mid-Oct. 2005 as the occupation
continues.  Ericson shows not just the numbers, but the branch of
service, the locations of the deaths and the causes of death (i.e.
explosive devices, vehicle or plane crashes, etc.).

It's a brilliant piece of work that also demonstrates the added value
that very good journalists and their editors can bring to what should
be public discussion.  But this kind of work doesn't happen
overnight, nor is it cheap to do.  (Are you listening
Knight-Ridder, Gannett, et al.?)

We would only hope that someone at the Times would work to develop a
flash program/presentation that would, in a relatively automatic
mannter, constantly update this important informational display.



What newspapers can — should? — being doing in the coming decade
Oct 25th, 2005 by Tom Johnson

Our associate Vince Giuliano had some words of wisdom last week for the
Innovation
International Media Consulting Group
and its audience in Cambridge, Mass. at the
“WHAT'S NEXT: THE NEW MEDIA LANDSCAPE” conference. 

Vince's PowerPoint presentation (no audio) deals with basic trends likely to have
profound affects on our lives over the coming 10 years – and key
implications of these trends for newspaper companies.  You can find
it in HTML format on the new Electronic Publishing Group website

www.epublishinggroup.com



GIS Development magazine: "FEMA's official flood maps called obsolete"
Oct 24th, 2005 by Tom Johnson

This in from the Houston Chronicle via GIS Development online mag:



“FEMA's official flood maps called obsolete



“Official maps that are supposed to guide homeowners and communities on
areas prone to flooding are obsolete and unreliable, a federal
investigation found. Despite a multi-year modernization effort, 70
percent of the maps are more than 10 years old, the inspector general
for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security concluded in a 63-page
report, which also found that many of the flood plains on the maps were
hand-drawn and are difficult to update. The criticism is the latest to
be leveled at the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which has been
widely blamed for mishandling the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.

“As
part of its management of the National Flood Insurance Program, FEMA
maintains more than 90,000 maps to show areas where flood insurance is
advisable and where construction would be risky. However, new
developments in flood zones have generally rendered the maps inaccurate
and obsolete. Faulty maps have a major impact on people and property
owners. Local communities rely on these maps to help them limit
construction within flood zones and to determine who can buy federal
flood insurance.

“The inspector general's report raises serious
questions about federal funding for the modernization effort, a $1.5
billion, six-year project that is intended to post accurate and easily
updated digital maps on the Internet by 2010. The program already is
behind schedule, and many state governments said that federal funding
is far short of what they need to provide correct mapping information.

Source : http://www.chron.com





Newspaper hand-rolls some Google Maps for hurricane coverage
Oct 24th, 2005 by Tom Johnson

Maurice Tamman, of the Herald Tribune, Sarasota, Fl, posts to the NICAR (National Institute of Computer-Assisted Reporting) listserv:

“In recent months we’ve been experimenting with Google
Maps APIs to bring dynamic maps to our coverage. (Last month we used it to
illustrate how Florida
property tax system creates crazy inequities: www.heraldtribune.com/saveourhomes/)

“Late last week, we slammed together a hurricane damage entry
and reporting system for the six Southwest Florida counties, from the Keys to Manatee County. Users can zoom to a neighborhood
and either view reported damage or report damage. (www.heraldtribune.com/damages/)

“I’m not sure how much use it’ll get because the
storm stayed so south of us. Still, I think it illustrates the flexibility of
the Google system over more expensive GIS server solutions, especially for
smaller papers.”


Good job in seeking to employ a creative application of existing tools.



3-D views of Hurricane Wilma
Oct 22nd, 2005 by Tom Johnson

NASA's hurricane site has posted some novel maps and graphics of Wilma, including some 3-D and animated illustrations of the “hot towers.”



The arrival of Hurricane Wilma on October 15, 2005, tied the record for
most named storms in a single Atlantic hurricane season. Within just
days Wilma went from tropical storm to Category 5 hurricane status and
broke the record for lowest pressure ever recorded inside a hurricane.
New satellite observations show towering thunderclouds, sometimes
called hot towers, that signaled the onset of intensification in this
remarkable storm.





Why is the U.S.A. a "Developing Nation" when it comes to broadband?
Oct 19th, 2005 by Tom Johnson

“October 18, 2005
Broadband's Crawl


Posted by Rekha Murthy at October 18, 2005 10:07 AM in Telecom/Internet.

An excellent article in today's Salon
magazine provides a thorough assessment of the state of broadband
access in the United States. The U.S. continues to fall behind other
countries in broadband penetration. The problem, according to the
article, stems from federal mismanagement of telecom policy and
misrepresentation of the current levels of broadband access and quality.

The digital divide seems to widen with each advance in technology —
even when a technology emerges that could make providing access cheaper
and easier. The divide runs along familiar lines of class and geography
(rural vs. urban), and the line between regions that can attract new
businesses and residents and those that can't. It can also be seen as a
divide between those with better access to news and information and
those without access.

The article also puts in fresh perspective efforts by municipalities — San Francisco
being the most recent and prominent — to provide broadband Internet
services directly to their citizens. Telecom companies claim that this
stifles the competition that can lead to lower prices and better
quality. And yet most Americans have neither.”



Helluva deal on ArcView for IRE members
Oct 19th, 2005 by Tom Johnson

GIS software discount for IRE members

Return to IRE Training



Members of Investigative Reporters and Editors, Inc., qualify for
discounts on geographic information system (GIS) software from ESRI,
the publisher of ArcView.
ESRI is offering ArcView GIS single use licenses at no charge to IRE
members
who agree to attend a GIS training event conducted by IRE and
NICAR or ESRI. Purchasers must sign a three-year maintenance agreement
with ESRI at a cost of $ 400 a year, with the first year's fee waived.
ArcView, the GIS program most widely used by journalists, lists for
$1,500. During the maintenance agreement period, purchasers will
receive software upgrades and technical support.

IRE members must attend a qualifying training session within one
year of entering the agreement with ESRI, which is based in Redlands
Calif., and has been a regular exhibitor at the annual IRE and CAR
conferences.
Qualifying sessions are IRE and NICAR's Mapping Data for News Stories
mini-boot camp, offered two times a year with the next scheduled for
Jan. 6-8, 2006; an online ESRI Virtual Campus course, and ESRI
classroom training.

For more information about IRE and NICAR training visit IRE Training . For more information about ESRI training see www.esri.com/training_events.html.
IRE members can also purchase discounted extension programs, which
expand the analytical capabilities of ArcView. The single-license cost
for Spatial Analyst, 3D Analyst and Geostatistical Analyst is $1,500
each. That is a 40 percent discount off the list price of $2,500 each.
To obtain an order form, please contact John Green, membership services
coordinator for IRE, at jgreen@ire.org or 573-882-2772.



»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa