Alfredo Covaleda,
Bogota, Colombia
Stephen Guerin,
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
James A. Trostle,
Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
Here at the IAJ we believe one of the reasons people come to newspapers or broadcast stations is to get the data which, upon analysis, they can turn into information that helps them make decisions. Ergo, the more meaningful data a journalistic institution can provide, the greater value that institution has for a community. A good example arrived today thanks to Tara Calishain, creator of ResearchBuzz. She writes: ** Getcher Cheap Gas Prices on Google Maps <http://www.researchbuzz.org/getcher_cheap_gas_prices_on_google_maps.shtml> “Remember when I was saying that I would love a Gasbuddy / Google Maps mashups that showed cheap gas prices along a trip route? Turns out somebody has already done it — well, sorta. You can specify a state, city (only selected cities are available) and whether you're looking for regular or diesel fuel. Check it out at http://www.ahding.com/cheapgas/ “
The data driving the map is ginned up by GasBuddy.com It's not clear how or why GasBuddy gets its data, but it offers some story potential for journalists and data for news researchers. It has an interesting link to dynamic graphs of gas prices over time.
Surely the promotion department of some news organization could grab onto this tool, tweak it a bit, promote the hell out of it, and drive some traffic to and build loyalty for the organization's web site.
That's the obvious angle, but what if some enterprising journo started to ask some questions of the data underlying the map? What's the range in gas prices in our town/state? (In Albuquerque today, the range was from $2.04 to $2.28.) Are there any demographic or traffic flow match-ups to that price range? How 'bout the variance by brand?
Would readers appreciate this sort of data? We think so, especially if there was an online sign-up and the news provider would deliver the changing price info via e-mail or IM much like Travelocity tells us when airline ticket prices change by TK dollars.
Regional Economic Models Inc. cordially invites you to join us on June 7th for a teleconference regarding Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC). On Friday May 13th Department of Defense released Recommendations to the BRAC commission. We feel that a discussion of BRAC studies and analysis methods would be helpful to a number of communities: Topics to be discussed include: – Demographic effects of active military, reservists, & dependents. – Migration effects of re-alignment or closures. – Dynamic effects of government spending over time. – The Impacts of lost or reduced civilian contracts. – Previous BRAC studies using the REMI model. – Other topics by REMI Guest Speakers. A presentation will be sent out before the call in order to direct and facilitate discussion. There will be two teleconferences taking place on the 7th, one at 10am, one at 4pm EST, hosted by Frederick Treyz and Jonathan Lee. There is no fee for participation, but space is limited. If you are planning on joining us or would like to participate in the discussion please respond to this e-mail, register online at www.remi.com or contact us by phone at (413) 549-1169. We look forward to speaking with you in June! Yours truly, Frederick Treyz, Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer Regional Economic Models, Inc. 306 Lincoln Ave. Amherst, MA 01002 T. 413-549-1169 F. 413-549-1038 Fredtreyz@remi.com www.remi.com
The power of good infographics is that they can greatly aid in the upstream aspects of journalism — providing insight for journalists to understand what's happening with a particular phenomena — and then downstream, to help journalists tell the story and for the audience to understand it. The Digital Revolution has upped the ante far beyond what good ol' Leonardo was using and envisioning. One of the innovators in today's datasphere is Alexander Tsiaras. A recent story in Digital Journal has this to say about Tsiaras's company, Anatomical Travelogue: “Digital Journal — At ideaCity04, one presenter was so overflowing with information that host Moses Znaimer had to enter stage right and patiently sit beside him, a silent reminder to wrap it up. But you couldn’t ask Alexander Tsiaras to gloss over the wonders of the human body, from blood flow to cell mutation.
During his presentation, he showed images from his visualization software company Anatomical Travelogue, whose clients include Nike, Pfizer and Time Inc. Tsiaras and his 25 employees take data from MRI scans, spiral CT scans and other medical imaging technologies, and use them to create scientifically accurate 3D pictures and animations.
In 2003, his book of images of fetal development, From Conception to Birth, sold 150,000 copies and his latest work is Part Two of this fantastic voyage, The Architecture and Design of Man and Woman. For a chapter on sex, Tsiaras even scanned an employee doing the deed with his girlfriend — all in the name of science.”
Jump into the study of epidemiology with Prof. David Kleinbaum and Prof. Nancy Barker in the online course “Fundamentals of Epidemiology” at statistics.com June 10 – July 15. Using their electronic textbook “ActiveEpi”, this introductory course emphasizes the underlying concepts andmethods of epidemiology. Topics covered include: study designs (clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies), measures of disease frequency and effect. Dr. Kleinbaum, professor at Emory University, is internationally known for his textbooks in statistical and epidemiologic methods and also as an outstanding teacher. He is the author of “Epidemiologic Research-Principles and Quantitative Methods”, “Logistic Regression- A Self-Learning Text”, and “Survival Analysis- A Self Learning Text”. Prof. Barker is a consulting biostatistician and a co-author of the “ActivEpi Companion Text”, and has over 10 years of experience teaching short courses in epidemiology and biostatistics at Emory and at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The course takes place online at statistics.com in a series of 5 weekly lessons and assignments. Course participants work directly with both instructors via a private discussion board. Participate in the course at your own convenience; there are no set times when you are required to be online. For registration and information: http://www.statistics.com/content/courses/epi1/index.html Peter Bruce courses@statistics.com P.S. Coming up June 3 at statistics.com: “Toxicological Risk Assessment” and “Using the Census's new 'American Community Survey' ” and, on June 10, “Categorical Data Analysis.”
Newsweek says Koran desecration report is wrong
By David Morgan Reuters Sunday, May 15, 2005; 7:01 PM
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Newsweek magazine said on Sunday it erred in a May 9 report that U.S. interrogators desecrated the Koran at Guantanamo Bay, and apologized to the victims of deadly Muslim protests sparked by the article.
“Editor Mark Whitaker said the magazine inaccurately reported that U.S. military investigators had confirmed that personnel at the detention facility in Cuba had flushed the Muslim holy book down the toilet.
“The report sparked angry and violent protests across the Muslim world from Afghanistan, where 16 were killed and more than 100 injured, to Pakistan to Indonesia to Gaza. In the past week it was condemned in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh, Malaysia and by the Arab League….”
Here's Newsweek's own telling of the tale: How a Fire Broke Out The story of a sensitive NEWSWEEK report about alleged abuses at Guantánamo Bay and a surge of deadly unrest in the Islamic world.
And we wonder why the public doesn't trust us?
The past eight days have presented Americans with two extremes of Analytic Journalism, the bad and the good.
The bad is Newsweek’s’ cover story that hit the stands on Monday, May 9, 2005, boldly headlined “2005 American’s Best High Schools: Ranking the Top 100.”
Inside, we are told that “Public schools are ranked according to a ratio devised by Jay Mathews: the number of Advanced Placement or International Baccalaureate tests taken by all students at a school in 2004 divided by the number of graduating seniors.” The table accompanying the story also includes a second variable: percent of the student body “eligible for free and reduced lunches, an indicator of socioeconomic status….”
But the backstory is even stranger. Remember, Newsweek is making a semi-big deal out of the fact that Washington Post reporter Jay Mathews “devised” the ratio. Yet Mathews himself wrote something somewhat different on December 27, 2004 in a piece headlined “Are Bonus Grade Points for Hard Courses Unfair?” Here is Mathews quoting from his own story [emphasis ours], which quotes a large-sample study on AP/IB testing conducted by Saul Geiser and Veronica Santelices of the University of California at Berkeley.
“Here is the news story I wrote about it last week. For those who don't have time to read the whole thing, this quote from the report sums it up well:
“’The main finding . . . is that, controlling for other academic and socioeconomic factors, the number of AP and honors courses taken in high school bears little or no relationship to students' later performance in college. The study is based on a sample of 81,445 freshmen entering the University of California (UC) [including eight campuses] between 1998 and 2001. While student performance on AP examinations is strongly related to college performance, many students who take AP courses do not complete the associated AP exams, and merely taking AP or other honors-level courses in high school is not a valid indicator of the likelihood that students will perform well in college.’”
So then tell us again why the percent of students who merely take the exams is indicative of the “best” high schools? Mathews is an experienced reporter who has covered education for a number of years. We wonder just how much direct involvement he had with the editors over at Newsweek.
We appreciate, however, the editors at least showing their secondary data, if not the raw numbers. (The online version ranks more than 1,000 U.S. high schools.) Where we disagree with Newsweek and Mathews is the use of any single variable to describe something as complex as measuring the quality of education. Here’s why:
· This index only measures test-taking; it says nothing about performance, either on the exams or once the students get to university. In fact, any graduating senior willing to pay $82 per AP test would be counted in the Mathews index. Ergo, should a school district want to rise in the ranks, it would allocate the funds to pay for 12 percent of its graduating seniors to take the AP exams and, presto, it becomes the No. 1 high school in the nation. [The No. 1 school reported 10.755 percent of its graduating seniors took the exam(s).]
Unlikely? IAJ fellow and former high school teacher Pat Mattimore reports: “A chairman of one of the ‘ranked public high schools’ back East e-mailed me that at her school classes are bribed with things like harbor boat cruises to get 100% participation on the exams as a result of Mathew’s ranking system.” [Click here for Mattimore’s essay on the topic.]
· This kind of “journalism” is only a step or two removed from the “Best Of …” lists so beloved by ad sales folks. Anybody can vote and vote often for their favorite pizza restaurant. For Newsweek to pull some cheap shot like this — aided and abetted by an experienced reporter from the WP — only compounds the Best Of… promotional sins and adds to the perceived shabbiness of journalism. Newsweek even misses opportunity with this approach: its website, that has the school rankings, has no search engine so readers can find their schools of interest (or NOT find their schools). This is just the kind of stats that cries out for a GIS server that would draw appropriate maps and attach “drill-down” data, the kind of thing USA Today and other newspapers have used to present voting results.
· More serious is that this single-index approach also feeds into the public's instinctive longing for a magic-bullet method of analysis and decision-making. There are few, if any, social phenomena that can be adequately described by one or two indices. This sort of Newsweek thinking supports simplistic solutions, e.g. the way to stop excessive drinking or abortions simply is to pass a law against them. The way to make people do the right thing is to post The Ten Commandments in prominent public places.
Responsible journalism in the Digital Age (aka, the Age of Data Access) should be trying to not over simplify but explain/illustrate complexity and the work required to understand highly complex issues like “educational quality.”
Good work at The Times
Fortunately a week later, The New York Times opened what may prove to be a fascinating series, “Class in America: Shadowy Lines That Still Divide”
“This series does not purport to be all-inclusive or the last word on class. It offers no nifty formulas for pigeonholing people. Instead, it represents an inquiry into class as Americans encounter it.” Reporters Janny Scott and David Leonhardt do a fine job in the opening article addressing – and illustrating – the complexity of understanding the role of class in the United States’, or any, society. They write: “The series does not purport to be all-inclusive or the last word on class. It offers no nifty formulas for pigeonholing people or decoding folkways and manners. Instead, it represents an inquiry into class as Americans encounter it: indistinct, ambiguous, the half-seen hand that upon closer examination holds some Americans down while giving others a boost.
“The trends are broad and seemingly contradictory: the blurring of the landscape of class and the simultaneous hardening of certain class lines; the rise in standards of living while most people remain moored in their relative places.”
No “nifty formulas”? Perhaps not yet in the story, per se, but the first-rate infographics, innovative ways of presenting the data and analysis. supporting the story sure draw on a lot of data, data analysis and provide some
The bottom line: Top-notch analytic journalism from The Times that informs readers while illustrating the complexity of the topic. Oh, but had Newsweek been able to invest in the same effort, what a good week it might have been.■
“Positive Deviance” Has a nice ring to it, don't you think? In fact, the concept has been batted around for 14-plus years and has evolved enough to have its own physical and virtual place in the universe at the Plexus Institute and Tufts University Positive Deviance Initiative. “Positive Deviance … demonstrates that isolated examples of success can be tapped to benefit an entire community or organization. Accomplishing this requires a radical departure from 'benchmarking' and 'best practices' strategies of change….The PD approach builds on successful but 'deviant' (different) practices that are identified from within a community or organization. It is based on the observation that in every group there are certain individuals whose uncommon, but demonstrably successful practices or behaviors enable them to find better solutions than their neighbors or colleagues who have access to exactly the same resources. Its use was pioneered in developing countries and has led to sustainable improvements in seemingly intractable organizational and social issues.”
The approach was originally developed for — and continues to be applied to — health care. But we at the IAJ like it because it is a “transferable concept and social technology,” something that could take root in “deviant” journalism.
We also like the approach because it is an example of how the high-level concepts of complexity studies and Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) can move from the theoretical to the experimental and on to application state. Again, something that journalism, and expecially journalism educators, should be thinking about.
We have long admired and appreciated the work of Dartmouth Professor J. Laurie Snell and his colleagues at the CHANCE project. (There are some terrific online lectures on all phases of statistics and probability at the Chance Lectures) We received the following recently: In order to give Chance News the chance for a longer life we have changed it to a ChanceWiki. The new url is http://chance.dartmouth.edu/chancewiki/ For the ChanceWiki we are using the software developed for the very successful free Encyclopedia Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ The wiki software makes it easy for anyone to add an item or to make changes in an existing article (hopefully an improvement) in the current Chance News. On the Main Page of the ChanceWiki you will find links to the current Chance news and “How to submit a new article or edit an existing article”. We hope you will try making a contribution. If you have any questions I will be happy to try to answer them. J. Laurie Snell jlsnell@dartmouth.edu
A talented band of coders in St. Petersburg, Russia has put together a nifty simulation modeling application written in Java. Anylogic™ “supports virtually all existing approaches to discrete event and continuous modeling, such as process flow diagrams, system dynamics, agent-based modeling, state charts, equation systems, etc. With this incredibly rich toolset you are not limited with the technology anymore – analyze the problem, identify the best approach, and find the solution!”
The package is relatively affordable, especially if one can qualify for the educational discount. It could make for a handy tool to model and/or illustrate a variety of dynamic aspects in an urban setting — ambulance response time, crowd movement during an anti-war demonstration. Today, too, the roll-out of the LA Times re-designed web site includes an intuitive interactive map of freeway traffic flow — real time — of the greater LA basin. Perhaps some enterprising news organization will figure out a way to tie these maps from SigAlert into the dashboard-mounted GPS navigation devices. Or will SigAlert itself deliver those goods?
The IAJ is always interested in people who are applying methods and technologies in some totally unanticipated manner.
The current issue of WIRED magazine carries a short about archeologists in Mexico using sophisticated technology developed by physicists to learn more about one of that nation's major pre-Columbia pyramids.
“Cosmic Secrets of the Pyramids” reports:
“…They're peering into the pyramid with muons, subatomic particles created when cosmic rays hit Earth's atmosphere. Traveling at nearly the speed of light, muons have enormous penetrating power – able to pierce half a mile of solid rock. (Researchers are using them to map lava tubes in active volcanoes and to try to find nuclear contraband in shipping containers.) Physicists with the National Autonomous University of Mexico are using muon density levels to scan Teotihuacán for cavities, perhaps the tombs of the mysterious civilization's rulers. Preliminary experiments suggest their detectors can find voids larger than 2½ feet across.“
Might a good county government reporter find “voids larger than 2½ feet across” at the next board of supervisors meeting?
Click here for still more on the topic.