Alfredo Covaleda,
Bogota, Colombia
Stephen Guerin,
Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
James A. Trostle,
Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
Abandoning the News
by Merrill Brown
What's the future of the news business? This report to Carnegie Corporation of New York offers some provocative ideas.
http://www.carnegie.org/reporter/10/news/index.html
Today's New York Times Science Section carries a column by Richard Friendman, M.D. about the challenge of explaining statistical concepts and probability to anyone. (Even journalists?) His conclusion: “The truth is that random events can make or break us. It is more comforting to believe in the power of hard work and merit than to think that probability reigns not only in the casino but in daily life.”
So there. See: “Mix Math and Medicine and Create Confusion.”
A different viewpoint about granting reporters too many privileges.
Dan Gillmor picks up a story from California's Contra Costa Times about a Republican operative who has been sending phony letters-to-the-editor bashing Demos, more than 200 letters for the past 10 years. According to the CC Times story…. “”Bogus letters have a tremendous effect on the readers,” Times Editorial Page editor Dan Hatfield said. “People need to be able to know that the letters to the editor are real people, writing about real issues. They need to be able to believe what they read in the newspaper. The discovery of false letters makes the reader wonder about the veracity of the opinions on our pages…. “Hatfield said the paper has tightened its policy, but there is no way to screen writers intent on breaking the rules…. “The Times, [San Francisco] Chronicle and [Tri-Valley] Herald have similar letter to the editor verification policies. A writer must provide his or her resident city and phone number. A newspaper employee then calls the writer to verify that they sent it in. “Unfortunately, there is not a fail-safe way that I have found. No matter how elaborate the system one designs, there is always some knucklehead out there who wants to ruin it for everyone by proving that he or she can beat it.” Maybe not a “fail-safe” way to stop this Astro-turfing, but stronger controls would be possible if an organization like the American Press Institute or Newspaper Association of American would create an online data base that all newspapers could have access to. The calling-to-check approach is pretty standard in the business. Each letters editor could enter the pertinent info on the writers they decide to publish into the data base. It wouldn't take much programming to do some automated data mining on phone numbers and/or cities or addresses or spelling patterns of names for flags to be raised. Sure, someone could always have a couple phone numbers and even a couple mailing addresses. But 200?
As to text analysis that could be applied to the language of the letters-to-the-editors, see the IAJ link lower right to Don Foster's book, Author Unknown.
Hardly a week seems to go by but one of those folks who calls himself/herself a journalist is busted for either “creative harvesting”, i.e. plagiarism, or engaging of the writing of fiction under the guise of journalism. The latest is a case involving Technology Review. According to Boston.com and AP:
“Review raises doubts about reporter's accuracy By Ken Maguire, Associated Press Writer | April 21, 2005
“…Technology Review, which is affiliated with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, last month retracted two Delio stories about the dismissal of Carly Fiorina as chief executive of Hewlett-Packard Co. after officials told Pontin they couldn't identify a Delio source.
The magazine pulled all 10 of Delio's articles from its Web site — including the two that were retracted — and hired Susan Rasky, a journalism instructor at the University of California, Berkeley, to investigate their accuracy.” Here at the IAJ, we think this removal is, at best, unprincipled and unprofessional on the part of the magazine. At worst, it is rewriting history. Either way, the action compounds any errors the author is alleged to have made. Librarians have wrestled with these digital issues for almost 20 years now. The consensus seems to be that, no, you don’t remove the offending documents, but you can/should flag the stories with a prominent note explaining the evolution of the case and offering, essentially, a “Reader Beware” notice. It wouldn’t hurt either if publications developed something akin to the “ethical guidelines” policies in place in many publications that would explain to readers that, “No, we do not alter the historic record.”
That said, check out J's Scratchpad and the entries for “Journalism Errors.” Jessica Baumgart, Information Resources Specialist in Harvard University's Office of News and Public Affairs, is taking the time to track these sorry events.
Spatial data analysis and Geographic Information System (GIS) technology contribute to the advancement of crime analysis and the better understanding of criminal behavior. Since 1997 the Mapping & Analysis for Public Safety (MAPS) program, formerly the Crime Mapping Research Center (CMRC), has reached out to academics and practitioners alike in the criminology, criminal justice and law enforcement communities to bridge the gap between research and practice. The MAPS program awards grants, sponsors conferences and workshops, publishes reports, and provides guidance. It also disseminates information on training opportunities in spatial data analysis techniques and GIS technology. In all, the program focuses on research, evaluation, development, coordination, and dissemination.
Gary Price's Resource Shelf indirectly pointed us to a new resource that can provide journalists with a quick and not-so-dirty GIS tool for their community or any other in the U.S. GeoLib is the Public Library Geographic Database (PLGDB) Mapping site. But its mapping engine delivers far more than just push-pining public libraries. The GIS server can display a variety of physical, demographic and political boundaries and data that can be turned on and off in traditional GIS layers. The resulting maps could be easily copied with a tool like Snag-It and dropped into a document or web page.
“Florida State University's GeoLib Program ( www.geolib.org ) is developing the National Public Library Geographic Database. The database includes the locations of 16,000 public libraries, data sets from the US Census, and library use statistics from the National Center for Educational Statistics. The goal of this database is to provide consolidated information on public libraries nationwide, easily accessible over the Internet. The project is sponsored by the Institute of Museum and Library Services ( www.imls.gov )
A key ingredient to the long term success of the PLGDB is the ongoing incorporation of other relevant data. We need your feedback as to what data you would like to have in the future. We hope the database will offer public librarians access to data that can shape local, regional and national library policies. For more information about GeoLib and its programs and to find out about the latest status and data releases of the National Public Library Geographic Database check back on this website regularly.”
A short, but touching, piece turned up on Alternet.org today, reminding us that no matter what government officials may say, at some point they are going to have to produce some numbers and measure change in those numbers. See: “Why Numbers Matter By Marla Ruzicka, AlterNet War on Iraq: Just before her death, Marla Ruzicka wrote about the importance of recording and publicly releasing Iraqi civilian casualty numbers.”
And this is the story from The Independent in the UK about Ms. Ruzicka and the general work related to tallying the numbers. See:
Finally, a news/obit on Ms. Ruzicka from the San Francisco Chronicle.
Here's a link to an education article with a suggestion to revamp the University of California admission's system. Our stake in public education
The good folks from TRAC just keep on keepin' on. Once again David Burnham and Susan B. Long are out in front on the effort to demand that the people's data be made available to the people. So comes this from TRAC today: “The IRS is illegally withholding information about its operations, claiming that the public release of some of it would compromise homeland security. Details of the agency's actions are laid out in the lawsuit against the IRS filed on April 14 under the Freedom of Information Act. The lawsuit, brought for TRAC's co-directors David Burnham and Susan B. Long by Scott Nelson of the Public Citizen Litigation Group, is part of an ongoing effort to provide the American people with information they need to judge how the IRS is carrying out its important responsibilities. The agency's current policy of refusing to make public routine statistical information and how it is collected reverses a thirty-year period of relative openness. To see a press release about the filing, the actual complaint and a short discussion of the dangers posed by IRS secrecy, go to”: http://trac.syr.edu/foia
