SIDEBAR
»
S
I
D
E
B
A
R
«
Big digital doors to GIS
Nov 7th, 2005 by JTJ

Susan Smith, editor of GISWeekly Review, reviews a new book from ESRI Press on GIS portals.  See review below or check out Spatial Portals: Gateways to Geographic Information



==============================

Spatial Portals Book Review
By Susan Smith

A new book out from ESRI Press called Spatial Portals: Gateways to Geographic Information
by Winnie Tang, founder and CEO of ESRI China (Hong Kong) and
Japan-based independent consultant Jan Selwood, offers a comprehensive
look at spatial portals from an ESRI point of view, using as examples
spatial portals developed with ArcExplorer Web Services, Geography
Network software, ArcIMS for internet mapping, and ArcSDE for data
management.

Spatial portals are described in this book as Web sites
that either “assemble many online resources and links into a single
location to form easy-to-use products or provide search tools that help
users find information on the Web.” Of course, portals such as America
Online and CompuServe have provided this type of single source for
resources for a long time; Google and Yahoo! and MSN have provided
search tools that are now in direct competition with ESRI in some
areas.

Three types of spatial portals are currently in use: application portals, catalog portals and enterprise portals.

Catalog portals maintain indexes or catalogs of available
information services. Generally service providers can add metadata to
the portal and it is then organized into a catalog that allows users to
access information.

Application portals are for the well-defined audience or those
with specific requirements and generally combine information services
into a Web-based mapping package that is task-specific. They usually
include dedicated application and data servers and provide services
that are more complex than catalog servers.

The enterprise spatial portal is designed to integrate spatial
data with business enterprise solutions. Initially they were originated
by Oracle and SAP, and their focus was on enterprise wide resource
planning, office automation and document management. Now they also
encompass spatial information.

Spatial portals are often the spatial data infrastructure
(SDI) front end to a network of information, and although SDI has been
used by organizations and governments since the 90s to organize, access
and search information, spatial portals allow faster access to
information than ever before.

What we've seen repeatedly in the past couple of years has
been the proliferation of spatial portals after a natural or other type
of disaster, such as the Indian Ocean tsunami or Hurricane Katrina. An
example is the Pacific Disaster Center's portal
launched within hours of the news of the tsunami, providing news, data
and links to mapping services related to the disaster. Also the PDC
launched a Map Viewer and an underlying map service.

Besides this portal, the PDC hosts a number of permanent portals to
help improve coordination of efforts and access to information.
Disaster and resource managers and others can register services such as
online or downloadable datasets with the Asia Pacific Natural Hazards Information Network
(APNHIN) so that governments, planners and non-governmental
organizations can search for and access information pertinent to hazard
evaluation and response planning.

Hurricane Katrina occurred after this book's publication so
the myriad of spatial portals developed to aid in response and recovery
for that disaster are not covered here.

Some time is spent on Geospatial One-Stop, whose mantra is
“two clicks to content.” The One Stop program, launched in December
2002, is an intergovernmental project managed by the Department of the
Interior in support of the President's Initiative for E-government.
Geospatial One Stop builds upon its partnership with the Federal
Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) to provide easy to use geospatial
information access to the public and government, drawing from databases
and directories across the nation.

In 2003, the Norwegian government endorsed Norway Digital, a
plan to develop a spatial data infrastructure with spatial portals at
its heart. Norway is a land of contrasts – 11 percent of the total
population live in Oslo, the nation's capital, while 45 percent live in
provinces located in 100 kilometers of the city, concentrating
population in the southeast. There are fewer than six people per square
kilometer in some municipalities.

While national mapping programs all have their own challenges,
Norway has addressed its problem of mapping remote regions by building
partnerships between public agencies and private industry. Although it
is focused on government agencies, Norway Digital embodies the building
of a national geospatial framework that is composed of multiple spatial
portals that can be used by participating members to build their own
sites and services. A new NMA portal is
geoNorge, which adds search functionality and indexing as well as hosts topographic map services across the whole framework.

The South Carolina Department of Health and Environment Control (DHEC)
has developed a portal called the South Carolina Community Assessment
Network (SCAN) South Carolina Community Assessment Network (SCAN)
that provides a real -time, interactive gateway to DHEC's databases.
Users can use it to integrate and analyze health data with other data
from state, local and federal agencies and provides efficient access to
public health information.

Each of the case studies found in the book are interesting
examples of what has been accomplished using spatial portals. The book
is described by one reader as a “true portal on spatial portals.”
Whether or not this is the case, the book is a valuable resource
showing just what spatial portals are capable of and how they are
changing the way we view, manage, sort, find, share and use geographic
information.
Spatial Portals: Gateways to Geographic Information, by Winnie Tang and
Jan Selwood, 176 pages
ESRI Press
ISBN 1-58948-131-3





More churning in the mapping API world
Nov 4th, 2005 by JTJ

Interesting
announcement from Yahoo Maps this week.  Seems as though Google,
Yahoo and Amazon (with it's A9 entry) are starting to look like three
NASCAR competitors on the backstretch of the lap before the finish
line.  Here's the latest from Yahoo:


==========================

November 02, 2005

Announcing New Maps APIs

In June of this year, we gave developers the ability to overlay
geographic data on a Yahoo! Map. Since then, we've seen a lot of
terrific maps mash-ups. But you wanted more. You wanted the ability to
embed Yahoo! Maps on your own Web site. You wanted to programmatically
convert addresses into geocoded longitude/latitude pairs. You wanted
more data feeds, such as highway traffic and local data, to plot on a
map. But most importantly, you wanted a user experience that's better
than any online mapping product out there.

Today we build on the success of the Simple Maps API
by adding several new APIs for Yahoo! Maps. These products enable
developers to use Yahoo! Maps in exciting new ways — including
embedding maps on your Web site.

With this release, we are providing:

Of course, the Simple Maps API
we released in June is still there, giving developers and
non-developers the ability to plot locations on Yahoo! Maps with no
programming and no rate limits.

We're giddy with excitement about this release, and we can't wait to
see how you use the new APIs. We know there's lot to digest here, so if
you have questions, feedback, or just want to show off what you've
done, please join us in the yws-maps group.

Jeffrey McManus


Director, Yahoo! Developer Network





Alternative thinking about the Avian Flu worst-case scenario
Nov 4th, 2005 by JTJ

Much
of what we've seen and read about the U.S. government's plan to stave
off a pandemic bird flu suggests that everyone — EVERYONE — needs to
be vaccinated.  Even if we knew what is necessary to produce an
appropriate vaccination, producing 280 million doses is not a trivial
task.




But
there may be another strategy that journalists should be asking about:
Isolation strategies and then vaccination of a limited number of
persons in a society.  These strategies have been developed as a
result of work by the simulation modeling folks, especially Josh Epstein at The Brookings Institute.




See — and be sure to click on the videos:
Toward a Containment Strategy for Smallpox Bioterror:
An Individual-Based Computational Approach

Joshua M. Epstein, Derek A. T. Cummings, Shubha Chakravarty,
Ramesh M. Singa, and Donald S. Burke
CSED Working Paper No. 31
December 2002




Digital detectives
Nov 3rd, 2005 by JTJ

For
those interested in the forensic process — and in this case, computer
forensics — be sure to check out this fine, fine piece of digital
detective work by Mark Russinovich, a computer security expert with
Sysinternals.  He
discovered evidence of a “rootkit” on his Windows PC.

We don't think journalists need to know how to DO this kind of
deep-diving probing, but  we should be aware that it is possible
and, broadly speaking, the methods if only to know the appropriate
search terms.




Through heroic forensic work,
he traced the code to First 4 Internet, a British provider of
copy-restriction technology that has a deal with Sony to put digital
rights management on its CDs. It turns out Russinovich was infected
with the software when he played the Sony BMG CD
Get Right With the Man by the Van Zant brothers.

Here's WIRED Magazine's take on the story, “The Cover-Up Is the Crime

And here's what Dan Gillmor had to say about it, with additional links.




We should be talking to — and learning from — each other
Nov 3rd, 2005 by JTJ

Another example of how journalists can learn from other disciplines comes to the surface in the form of an LA Press Club meeting Nov. 9.



Digging deep: What reporters can learn from and about private investigators,” is the topic, and the panel of speakers, though large, seems rich with potential.

Here at the IAJ we also value the well done blog, “PI News Link,” run by Tamara Thompson.  Check it out; enter it in your blog harvester.



Managing the news data flow
Nov 2nd, 2005 by Tom Johnson

We're all awash in data, so finding the significant bits and bytes that can lead to information is a maddening process.



Jon Burke, writing in the
November 2, 2005 edition of

MIT's Technology Review, presents some web-based technological options.  See
Finding Signals in the Noise.”






We were impressed by a new product/site called “Memeorandum,” but Burke points out a handful of alternatives.



Excerpt:

“Few would dispute that we live in an age of
information overload. In the last few years alone, blogs have increased
the torrent of information each day to unmanageable levels.  This
would explain, then, why a corresponding torrent of startups has
surfaced recently to help us filter, manage, and control this flood of
information. Some rely on insightful algorithms that understand
popularity to filter the news, while others rely on the preferences of
readers.

For example, Digg
is a San Francisco startup that ranks news items by letting people
choose which stories they like. It just landed $2.8 million in venture
capital from Omidyar Network, former Netscape founder Marc Andreessen,
and Greylock Partners. We also understand that a comparable site — Memeorandum — may close a round of financing shortly.

The concept of making users prioritize or create hierarchies for news is not new — Slashdot
has been doing it since 1997. But the latest generation of sites like
Digg and Memeorandum are showing that user-prioritized news is, indeed,
a powerful and easy way to drive traffic — in some cases to a site
created by a single employee with a lone server.”




Simulated Journalism? Not exactly, but a topic of relevance
Nov 1st, 2005 by Tom Johnson

Simulation
modeling is one of the four cornerstone areas of interest to the
IAJ.  It's a relatively new, and largely unknown, field that can
be of great advantage to journalists if we can take the time to learn
how it works and then how we can apply it to our field.  The best
resource to date for journalists is the J-Lab, (http://www.j-lab.org/) at the University of Maryland.

But today along comes this announcement of a rich issue of the Journal
of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
.  It's filled with
deep thinking and application.

=============================================
The
Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
(http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk) published issue 4 of Volume 8 on 31
October 2005.




JASSS is an electronic, refereed journal devoted
to the exploration and understanding of social processes by means of
computer simulation.   It is freely available, with no
subscription.


=================



This issue is our largest
ever, with 12 peer-reviewed articles, eight of them forming a special
section on Epistemological Perspectives, edited by Ulrich Frank and
Klaus Troitzsch.




If you would like to volunteer as a referee and have
published at least one refereed article in the academic literature, you
may do so by completing the form at
http://www.epress.ac.uk/JASSS/webforms/new_referee.php



==============================
===

Peer-reviewed Articles
=================================

How Can Social Networks Ever Become Complex? Modelling the Emergence of Complex Networks from Local Social Exchanges
   by  Josep M. Pujol, Andreas Flache, Jordi Delgado and Ramon Sanguesa
       <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/12.html>

Violence and Revenge in Egalitarian Societies

   by  Stephen Younger
       <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/11.html>

Influence of Local Information on Social Simulations in Small-World Network Models

   by  Chung-Yuan Huang, Chuen-Tsai Sun and Hsun-Cheng Lin
       <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/8.html>

It Pays to Be Popular: a Study of Civilian Assistance and Guerrilla Warfare

   by  Scott Wheeler
       <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/9.html>

—————————————–
Special Section on Epistemological Perspectives on Simulation

   by  Ulrich Frank and Klaus G. Troitzsch
       <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/7.html>

Towards Good Social Science
   by  Scott Moss and Bruce Edmonds

       <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/13.html>

A Framework for Epistemological Perspectives on Simulation
   by  Joerg Becker, Bjoern Niehaves and Karsten Klose

       <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/1.html>

What is the Truth of Simulation?
   by  Alex Schmid
       <
http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/5.html
>

The
Logic of the Method of Agent-Based Simulation in the Social
Sciences:  Empirical and Intentional Adequacy of Computer
Programs
   by  Nuno David, Jaime Simao Sichman and Helder Coelho
       <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/2.html>

Validation of Simulation: Patterns in the Social and Natural Sciences

   by  Guenter Kueppers and Johannes Lenhard
       <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/3.html>

Stylised Facts and the Contribution of Simulation  to the Economic Analysis of Budgeting

   by  Bernd-O. Heine, Matthias Meyer and Oliver Strangfeld
       <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/4.html>

Does Empirical Embeddedness Matter? Methodological Issues on Agent-Based Models for Analytical Social Science

   by  Riccardo Boero and Flaminio Squazzoni
       <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/6.html>

Caffe Nero: the Evaluation of Social Simulation
   by  Petra Ahrweiler and Nigel Gilbert
       <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/14.html>

===============================================================

Book Reviews    (Review editor: Edmund Chattoe)
==============================
=================================

Edmund Chattoe reviews:
       Routines of Decision Making by Betsch, Tilmann and Haberstroh, Susanne (eds.)

       <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/reviews/chattoe.html>

===============================================================

The new issue can be accessed through the JASSS home page: <http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk>.

The next issue will be published at the end of January 2006.

Submissions are welcome: see
http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/admin/submit.html

____________________________________________________________________________
JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION

<http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/>
Editor: Nigel Gilbert, University of Surrey, UK
Forum Editor: Klaus G. Troitzsch, Koblenz-Landau University, Germany
Review Editor: Edmund Chattoe, University of Oxford, UK

______________________________
__________________________________________



Sent from the EPRESS journal management system, http://www.epress.ac.uk
Niche professsions doing the same thing journalists do
Oct 31st, 2005 by Tom Johnson

The
premise of the IAJ is to discover find how other professions and academic
disciplines do what we do as journalists.  That is, how do they
find and analyze data and then present the results of that
analysis. 

We recently subscribed (it's free) to Law Technology News.  It's no surprise that the data management needs of large law offices are
much the same as those of journalism organizations.  Lawyers
pretty much follow the RRAW-P process, too.  So topics like 
Calendaring, Case Management, Contact Management, Document Management,  Electronic Data Discovery (EDD)
are right up our alley.


Law Technology News doesn't do much journalism, in fact it pretty much
reprints press releases.  But it does provide many, many pointers
to products and methods related to journalism.  Give it a look.
as well.



When it comes time to do that redistricting story….
Oct 27th, 2005 by Tom Johnson

A future question for the SAT or GRE exams: “What is the relationship between Tom DeLay and redistricting?” 
Obviously that one is going to have many, many possible correct
answers.  But redistricting is a difficult and complex
topic.  This recent paper, though, might provide a good jumping
off point for reporters working on the topic.




“Public Choice Principles of Redistricting”



    BY:  JOHN G. MATSUSAKA

            USC Marshall School of Business

            USC School of Law

         THOMAS W. GILLIGAN

            University of Southern California

            Marshall School of Business



Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:

         http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=775186



Paper ID:  USC Law and Economics Research Paper No. 05-18; USC

         CLEO Research Paper No. C05-8

  Date:  July 2005



 Contact:  JOHN G. MATSUSAKA

 Email:  Mailto:matsusak@usc.edu

 Postal:  USC Marshall School of Business

         Dept. of Finance & Business Economics

         Los Angeles, CA 90089  UNITED STATES

 Phone:  213-740-6495

   Fax:  213-740-6650

 Co-Auth:  THOMAS W. GILLIGAN

 Email:  Mailto:TGILLIGAN@MARSHALL.USC.EDU

 Postal:  University of Southern California

         Marshall School of Business

         Los Angeles, CA 90089  UNITED STATES



ABSTRACT:

 This paper uses fundamental principles of public choice, mainly  the median voter theorem, to develop a simple theory of  redistricting. The focus is on how closely policy outcomes  correspond to majority rule. The main results are: (1) Potential  policy bias in favor of nonmajority groups is structurally  linked to the number of legislative seats and the population,  and the structure of most states puts them very close to the  theoretically maximum bias. (2) Random districting, which might  seem like the essence of neutrality, does not eliminate policy  bias on average. (3) Traditional principles of compact,  contiguous districts that respect existing political boundaries,  stressed in the Supreme Court's Shaw v. Reno decision, minimize

 the chance of nonmajoritarian outcomes.”





When it comes time to do that redistricting story….
Oct 27th, 2005 by Tom Johnson

A future question for the SAT or GRE exams: “What is the relationship between Tom DeLay and redistricting?” 
Obviously that one is going to have many, many possible correct
answers.  But redistricting is a difficult and complex
topic.  This recent paper, though, might provide a good jumping
off point for reporters working on the topic.




“Public Choice Principles of Redistricting”



    BY:  JOHN G. MATSUSAKA

            USC Marshall School of Business

            USC School of Law

         THOMAS W. GILLIGAN

            University of Southern California

            Marshall School of Business



Document:  Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:

         http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=775186



Paper ID:  USC Law and Economics Research Paper No. 05-18; USC

         CLEO Research Paper No. C05-8

  Date:  July 2005



 Contact:  JOHN G. MATSUSAKA

 Email:  Mailto:matsusak@usc.edu

 Postal:  USC Marshall School of Business

         Dept. of Finance & Business Economics

         Los Angeles, CA 90089  UNITED STATES

 Phone:  213-740-6495

   Fax:  213-740-6650

 Co-Auth:  THOMAS W. GILLIGAN

 Email:  Mailto:TGILLIGAN@MARSHALL.USC.EDU

 Postal:  University of Southern California

         Marshall School of Business

         Los Angeles, CA 90089  UNITED STATES



ABSTRACT:

 This paper uses fundamental principles of public choice, mainly  the median voter theorem, to develop a simple theory of  redistricting. The focus is on how closely policy outcomes  correspond to majority rule. The main results are: (1) Potential  policy bias in favor of nonmajority groups is structurally  linked to the number of legislative seats and the population,  and the structure of most states puts them very close to the  theoretically maximum bias. (2) Random districting, which might  seem like the essence of neutrality, does not eliminate policy  bias on average. (3) Traditional principles of compact,  contiguous districts that respect existing political boundaries,  stressed in the Supreme Court's Shaw v. Reno decision, minimize

 the chance of nonmajoritarian outcomes.”





»  Substance:WordPress   »  Style:Ahren Ahimsa